|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The current Betfair betting market on the U.S. Masters is 80.9%. I would assume the list of players of 24 is incomplete and that others not yet shown may qualify?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I forgot to mention that about five minutes before the commencement of today's Australian Masters that the Betfair market was under 97%.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Michealg
Yep, I saw the US market as well & thought I had struck gold, until I realised that there are a lot more than 24 starters. Trap for the unwary methinks. Unless of course the winner comes from those listed. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hi, Mark.
I remember some time ago Mark Read offered head-to-head odds on a certain boxing match. The match was a draw, and because he did not offer any odds for the draw there was a huge outcry because every one who had a bet with him could not win. I do not know what was the final outcome - if money was refunded, the bets voided or whatever. So, if someone backs a current golfer on the Betfair list, and a late entry or an unlisted golfer wins, I wonder then if there is some justification to argue that it was impossible to back the winner when the bet was made, just as was with the "Mark Read" scenario. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Michaelg,
That's actually false - I happened to work for Read at the time and the draw was always an option in that fight. However of all the complaints (20+), two phone calls were found where the operator left out the draw, those bets were voided. Can't remember the fighters involved - big heavyweight fight in 1999, Don King was the promoter. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
and as for the Betfair golf scenario - it's like nearly every other bookie - others added upon request....
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Zeditave
Do you still work fo him?, if so what's happening with the Caloundra setup. Betting exchange or just bookie-ing some meetings, or all?. Mark |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hi zeditave,
I have been betting with IAS for about nine months and have noticed a disturbing trend. You might be able to enlighten me as you used to work there. I bet on greyhounds with IAS via the internet and in the last month or so, every winner I back with IAS returns the shortest dividend on the NSW tote. IAS offer NSW tote odds plus a very small bonus for the greyhounds. I generally only have around $100 to $200 the WIN on my greyhound selections and since March, my bank with IAS has grown from $3000 to $13000. My win strike rate is consistently around 33% and I win at around 70% of meetings I bet at. I have been betting on dogs for a living for a number of years. I have noticed that all my bets are coming up real short on the NSW tote and I wonder if IAS are back betting my selections because they want to get rid of them. When I joined IAS, they assured me that they don't back bet for small bets but I'm just wondering if you could shed some light on this matter. I am probably better off reverting to what I have done for years and that is just bet the three totes for equal amounts. I don't feel like I should be tipping IAS on my hard work. I put in about 40 hours per week on form study via videos etc. [ This Message was edited by: Rock Steady on 2003-12-17 11:56 ] [ This Message was edited by: Rock Steady on 2004-01-05 08:22 ] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|