|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can Excluding Over-Bet Factors Make a Difference?
Hi All,
Having read a lot of the previous threads, one aspect that has always intrigued me is the concept of filters. My intention of this thread is to look at when a filter becomes 'over-bet' and then as such, becomes a detriment to our profit. My first contribution is Barriers - I have read on here, and believe that the inside barriers are over-bet. So with this in mind I took a system that had a little bit of success, and applied the filter, barrier 6 or wider. The S/R dropped slightly but the POT lifted at a lot higher level. Now I will preface this by saying, I do not have a database and have used a free source to look at the figures and I doubt if it is overly reliable, but all I did was run the system, then add the filter and the results were positive. I am interested in 2 things:- 1 If the database guys out there have ever run this filter and does it return similar results? 2 Are there any other 'over-bet' factors people believe can have a similar effect. Cheers Brett
__________________
“Money, horse racing and women, three things the boys just can't figure out.” |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
2. Yes there are many. Some depend on the situation. For example first uppers who have won first up before are generally overbet, but resumers in general are underbet. There are many more situations like that as well. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
They are generally overbet for a reason. exploit the reason, don't go for next layer of low hanging fruit
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Benton and UB,
I fear I have tried to feast on Low Hanging fruit for years............. UB, I know you used to have a great site to test systems on, what happened to it if you don't mind me asking?
__________________
“Money, horse racing and women, three things the boys just can't figure out.” Last edited by Brett V.02 : 25th July 2013 at 07:40 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I found under $3 for me were overbet and unprofitable and since I now wont bet anything under that the profit has increased considerably..
This applies to both wet and dry conditions. Cheers |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Beware that by saying "I will only bet above my breakeven point" only moves the breakeven higher and greatly reduces the bets. It does not improve the bottom line. Moving away from the low prices may bring it into profit, but get too greedy and you run the risk of losing out. You are better to ask why the bets are overbet in a similar manner that RP did for longshots. Remove some obvious deadwood to improve the bottomline.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Benton,
What if I fear I am the DEADWOOD!!!!!!
__________________
“Money, horse racing and women, three things the boys just can't figure out.” |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Wow,
Sorry LG and Beton............I have misread your name since the start of time hahahahaha
__________________
“Money, horse racing and women, three things the boys just can't figure out.” |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|