No worries, L.G.

Unfortunately the Bendigo quaddie died a bad death in the last leg. Pity because the first two legs got the double-priced winners. The quaddie paid $6,000.

Yeah I saw that.. lets see how the last in Scone gets buttered??

LG

__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB

Anyone seen Dicko? Not a popular chap i can tell you... !

LG

__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB

No, Dicko. How disappointing are you?

At least our quaddies so far are quite large. Hopefully Bunbury...

Yup... a nice set of buns to bake at Bunbury.

LG

__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB

Just throwing this out there. I read earlier in this post that the large outlay and relative returns are a posible issue.

Would it not be an option to look at this like a single selection method and not an exotic method.

When people look at exotic selection methods, the concept is small outlay for large, occasional returns. But this appears to lean towards a large outlay for frequent returns, a concept usually associated with a single selection method. People do not have an issue outlaying a percentage of bank for a single selection on favourites with filters. So if the average dividend and win percentage allow, would this not be the way to look at it.

Cheers

Doc

I forgot to mention that flexi betting allows us to do this.

Cheers

Doc

Happy to have avoided the curse.

So for a $40.40 outlay a return of 54.23 means...........

$1.34 for the win
or
$2.68 for an each way bet (to place)

Cheers

Doc