Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 22nd March 2006, 09:57 AM
Duritz Duritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
Default

Yeah good ideas - when I get time next day or two I'll re-run with that stipulation, post the results here.

Crash - you'd like it because it uses ratings, ie it's an automated handicapping program, using the ratings, you then take the top pick and if it passes a couple of "filter" rules, it's a bet. That's why there's heaps of bets at varying odds, every race is a possible bet. (check that, every race without any first starters in it)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22nd March 2006, 11:08 AM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by partypooper
Chrome, but thanks heaps as that gives us an idea of as to the HUGE claims of some shall we say "commercial" ideas, that SEEM to promise much greater returns!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !


Hi partypooper,

It's not the POT or the profit that is spectacular, you may have misunderstood me, it's the viability of the system continuing.

I've never seen profit made up from over 100 horses based on the average win dividend using TAB prices over 2 years.

That's not to say that other entities may not have higher POT or $$$ profit.

I personally would put serious money on these selections outlined in the thread.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 412,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/12/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22nd March 2006, 11:12 AM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duritz
Nah it ain't retrofitted Chrome - but I don't want your cheque!

The results, broken down by year, were -

2004 (calendar year)

bets - 2705
wins - 688 (s/r 25.4%)
out - 2705
coll - 2849
pot - +5.3%
ave div - $4.10

2005

bets - 3154
wins - 816 (s/r 25.9%)
out - 3154
coll - 3427
pot - +8.6%
ave div - $4.20


Hi Duritz,

I was not aware that it was your system, I thought it was something you came across in cyberspace or from a mag.

No offence intended, it did seem too good to be true, but if you are using it, then you don't need me looking over your shoulder

Perhaps you remember when we were best mates and went to school together and I let you stay in my high rise apartment last week?



Perhaps not
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 412,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/12/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22nd March 2006, 11:28 AM
Duritz Duritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
Default

I am going to start backing it, that'll be the acid test.

Strange thing is, I'm not even excited about it, I guess b/c I need to see it work when my money is on it for it to be real in my mind.

I'll keep you posted.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22nd March 2006, 01:06 PM
KennyVictor KennyVictor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Mt Tamborine
Posts: 574
Default

Hi Duritz,

You say it's not backfitted but:
Was there a backfitting element involved when you developed the handicapping system? Like did you try 1 length = 0.5Kg, no that doesn't work how about 1 length = 0.4Kg, etc until it showed good results? Or have you proved the handicapping part works on fresh data not used for development?
Assuming your ratings are backfitting free did you take the ratings over the two year period and then try different filters over the top of them until you came up with a nice profitable outcome. This of course would be backfitting too.

I ask these questions not to try to shoot you down or anything of the sort and I hope your answers to both of them are in the negative. Just injecting an air of caution into the ebullient atmosphere your results have engendered lest you be carried away on the tide of expectation into perdition, depression and ultimate financial ruin.

Cheerfully yours,
KV
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22nd March 2006, 01:23 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
Default

Kenny,

Dare not say it, but if Duritz can show a TAB profit on 5,500 selections in 2 years, and his profit is not even made up from 10 longshots, then his retrofitting or backfitting doesn't really matter.

When I mentioned backfitting, I thought the results were from some peddlar who may have "jimmied" the bets, not necessarily backfitted.

If Duritz has set rules and handicapping and has not left out any other horses, then he is on the ride of a lifetime.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 412,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/12/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 22nd March 2006, 04:46 PM
Duritz Duritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 956
Default

Hi KV - the handicapping program has been improved over the last year or so as I have developed it, until it is where it is now. I suppose in a sense the handicapping program itself is "retro fitted" given that I have tested, changed etc as I've gone along, however it's not fitted with silly rules like "barrier 6-11" or anything, it just uses their ratings, and predicts what they'll rate today, and minuses for weight, jockey, barrier. So then it has its selections, using the top pick if it passes one simple rule then it's a bet.

The power isn't in the one simple rule, the power is in the handicapping program. On it's own, you can level stake the top pick and lose 2%, the rule pushes it into the profit.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 22nd March 2006, 07:26 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyVictor
Hi Duritz,

You say it's not backfitted but: [snip]
I ask these questions not to try to shoot you down or anything of the sort and I hope your answers to both of them are in the negative. Just injecting an air of caution into the ebullient atmosphere your results have engendered lest you be carried away on the tide of expectation into perdition, depression and ultimate financial ruin.

Cheerfully yours, KV


Kenny I just love the above. You should set up a punter's minder service. You'll save the poor ************s thousands !!! :-)

Cheers, Crash
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 22nd March 2006, 10:07 PM
KennyVictor KennyVictor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Mt Tamborine
Posts: 574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
You should set up a punter's minder service. You'll save the poor ************s thousands !!! :-)
If it weren't for the perdition, depression and financial ruin I find myself in I'd do just that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:52 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655