Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > General Topics
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 9th November 2014, 01:07 PM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
Hi Rincon ,
Perhaps you would run that through your R2W data base.
I,m interested in the outcome

Cheers and thanks



Hahahaa, that's like waving a red flag at a bull Darky. Haven't been with them for awhile now. Banned from mentioning them!

Found an interesting stat from a CP post in 2004.

60% of races are won by a horse that ran 1st-4th last start
Also consider:
1st in at least one of its last two starts: 31%
2nd in at least one of its last two starts: 29%
That's a 60%er in my book.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 9th November 2014, 01:26 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile

Sorry.
I didnt know that.

With CP figures was there a preferred price range.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 9th November 2014, 01:33 PM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
Sorry.
I didnt know that.

With CP figures was there a preferred price range.

Cheers


Sorry Darky and apologies to CP, it wasn't his post, it was Chuck.
If you search for the thread Useful Facts and Stats, there's 5 pages of stuff. I don't Back anything, but it's always handy to know when laying what the percentages are stacked against you. Happy researching.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 9th November 2014, 01:47 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
LG,
Is your thinking along the lines of excluding LS winners but including 3rd and 2nd runs in current campaign.

I love this sort of intellectual challenge.

Thanks for posting.

ps I will look along the lines of price ranges i.e $2 - $11 but today ALL price ranges.

Good luck with it.


Hi Darky, was just thinking.. why don't we take the standard form goggles off every now and then, flip the lenses and put em back on. See what we get.

Beats watching favorites getting up 30% of the time till the paint dries??

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 9th November 2014, 02:12 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile

Good point because 67 % of non favs get up.

Will have a look at the thread Rinconpaul suggested.

I have most of Malcolm Knowles research here too.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 9th November 2014, 02:13 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile

Thanks Rinconpaul.
Will do.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 9th November 2014, 02:17 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Good call Darky.

Was meaning to ask you - what sticks out from Mr Knowles in your opinion i.e. stuff which still holds true - stands up today??

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 9th November 2014, 02:23 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Smile

The thing that sticks out with Malcolms research is that the stats run over hundreds of thousands of races and not just a few thousand so in my opinion more likely to stand up long term.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 9th November 2014, 02:28 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
The thing that sticks out with Malcolms research is that the stats run over hundreds of thousands of races and not just a few thousand so in my opinion more likely to stand up long term.

Cheers


Including that old chesnut you allude to from time to time = 55kg+ I take it?

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 9th November 2014, 02:41 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Winners from randwick yesterday with last 3 starts etc

52 (0)
1 (6) 2.50
241 (3) 4.60
31x (2) 2.80
324 (2)
5x2 (4)
215 (6) 25.70
45x (4)

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655