Fair suck of the sav lads. Jacfin's reply could be termed 'aggressive' if you're the sensitive type but the other two lads were quite within their rights to ask where you got your numbers from.
And in Jacfin's defence he wouldn't be the first to sternly question someones results reported AFTER the race. I have a feeling you may have done that on one or two occasions Crash.
Cynicism and suspicion go with the territory here. If we believe all we hear or read we're going to be up a certain creek without a rowing device.

KV

Run that by me again?
Where exactly was my chainsaw comment?

I would have thought that if a selection won at $25.00, the PP price of $13 was more correct, accurate and well informed than the $100 PP price..

Is that logical now?

But.. you did give me a great idea that showed 300% return looking back at
Saturdays longshots.

Come on Kenny mate, your unfairly underestimating me [and probably Stix's intent too]. I reckon I've done the above you mentioned a few hundred times at least [sternly question someones results]. Give a bloke's score card a bit of credit and a fair score. A 'couple' of times? I feel insulted !!!

I don't mind some 'hard' questioning [I would hope so anyway] and I'm sure anyone would agree [and those concerned], I've hardly taken the blokes apart for doing it to me have I? I wouldn't expect any less from the no-holds barred-crew here. I didn't read any animosity in their posts and responded accordingly. Perhaps Stix just misinterpreted the posts as 'nasty', but I take support wherever I find it :-)

Lighten up mate, I think you have missed the plot here maybe[?] It's ALL good natured I think. Did you have a bad Saturday too 8-) ?

There you go Kenny. I helped one of the poor sods out. He's going to make a friggen fortune from my idea !!!!