 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
27th July 2012, 12:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
An experiment (greyhound racing)
Some selections for today, if more than one selection then take a pick, they are in alphabetical order only, no special preference as far as I'm concerned.
Code:
good luck 
|
|
#2
28th July 2012, 10:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Out $98 In $91.80 Give it a couple more days and then back to the drawing board with this one. Code:
Good luck
|
|
#5
29th July 2012, 08:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
May they RIP The less said the better. Made some changes. Text file. This time they are sorted in what "I think" they should be. good luck Last edited by lomaca : 29th July 2012 at 09:02 AM.
|
|
#6
29th July 2012, 09:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't get it. Is it the best bet of the day is the very first animal and the worst bet the last mentioned animal? You haven't just separated animals in the same race , but have done more than that. When you say "I THINK" , you previously admittedly suggest your knowledge of things greyhound are somewhat lacking , is the "I THINK" based on previous results , and the method you employ? Can you not see that occasionally your method throws out an Odds On Chance , and then in other cases it throws out 100 to 1 shots. This sort of output is very similar to random numbers or the dartboard approach. Good Luck with it though.
|
|
#7
29th July 2012, 09:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Maybe I should have elaborated but did not see a reason for it. After all, the races are in time order and the animals are sorted according MY ranking. if I had allocated prices for them, then they would be in an ascending order. Can't see any problem there? Quote:
Why can't you let us indulge in our little phantasies and let things be? Win lose or break even, when I post I don't ask anyone to follow my tips.
|
|
#8
29th July 2012, 10:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The text file got scrambled as far as the jump-time is concerned. See if it gets through OK this time? Yup, seems to be OK! Must have been a gremlin in the works, was all right on this side. Oh well never mind. Last edited by lomaca : 29th July 2012 at 10:23 AM.
|
|
#9
29th July 2012, 10:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hardly my fault that I found it originally confusing then. I was only trying to understand your method. i best leave you to it , as our relationship is starting to fall apart again. Cheers and sorry for upsetting you.
|
|
#10
29th July 2012, 12:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
They lose on some on those days but the overall profit covers the losses for each of those particular days. (like Mondays are still in profit despite of two losing Mondays) Also true that there are some big priced winners amongst the smaller ones, but I name those dogs in advance not claim them in retrospect! My methods maybe unorthodox and frowned upon by the "purist", but so what? It's the bottom line that matters! Here are the results, should be easy to check, all dividends are Supertab. Last edited by lomaca : 29th July 2012 at 12:45 PM.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
