#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well I did read recently on a thread that there doesn't seem to be any systems posted lately. I concur. Try this one.
Go to Racingandsports and get Don Scott ratings for the meetings. Take note of top 2 rated horses. Top rated needs to rated $3.00 or less and the 2nd rated needs to at least $2.50 longer price. Back top rated. I have been following this for a while and there are good and bad but is quite consistent. As for systems and useful information on forum, I am not sure what the reasoning of being on forum for some users is as there is very little given away, is that because people are not quite as successful as they sprook or if they do not want to give there information to other people that is fine but why come on to forum skiting and then say nothing? Hopefully somebody gets something from this Eddy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() well I got nothing from your post eddy.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
There are many reasons to be on a forum Eddy. Mateship, as punting is a fairly lonely journey. Keeping up to date with goings on. Being open to new ideas or theories. I don't think it has anything to do with being successful or not. Testing and discussing systems, does not necessarily mean one is not successful otherwise. Skiting gets up my nose also, especially when one has been around a long time and knows that amounts cannot possibly be matched on Betfair for example. I guess it comes down to areas of expertise. I'm not interested in ratings, but very keen on systems and idiosyncracies of markets. Primarily I take advantage of market movements, but am always interested in genuine systems.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 405,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 31/07/2024 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well likewise Shifty, I got nothing from your post either. Hopefully you have been getting something from previous posts that I have missed the "something" to be read out of them.
I understand what you are saying Chrome and I agree but there only so much waffle we can read before it becomes boring. Eddy |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Here you go Eddy, there was a system posted on here that had 10 consecutive winners using something similar to yours. A little research and away you go. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Was it one of Baghwans Shifty.?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not bhagwans darky. Cant recall who it was, I just noted down the system. Went very quiet after the 10th winner.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|