|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Some nice efforts there, Mo. Congrats.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Thank you for that Merriguy. But what you see ain't always what you get. But then again , is possible to get more than what you see. When Framed Markets are used as a guide, then its possible to come up with winning wagers or losing wagers. In the order of races I posted heres how I went. Cranbourne Race 8 I lost badly backing my 2nd selection that was an Overlay. But it wasn't hard to find the Quinella , as it was filled by my 1st and 3rd selections. Probably paid good too as the Winner paid $17 or so , and was an Overlay I had rated at $9 at 3rd pick. That I managed to lose heavily on the race shows that I am lacking in what it takes to interpret the correct way to wager. I think what may have occurred , was that I became fixated on my top 2 selections and forgot to view the race Field as a whole. Cranbourne Race 10 The late scratching threw my early thoughts away , but the substitute wager decision was obvious and I only lost heavily due to being beaten by an animal I had dismissed as a winning chance. Cranbourne Race 5 After recommending a $20 Win Bet on the winner of the Race , I couldn't get top Odds and ended up not having the wager myself. Shepparton Race 7 I actually posted and purchased a winning wager finally. But also lost some of that winnings on a Win Wager on my top selection which ran poorly. Shepparton Race 8 Got the race wrong and lost heavily on my top selection. So its not about having the winner in your top 2 or 3 selections. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|