Thanks guys. I've just broken the odds range down to 10c increments with the following results but I had been using a $30 liability for testing.

2.00-2.10.....-13.78
2.12-2.20.....193.26
2.22-2.30.....163.16
2.32-2.40.....-3.72
2.42-2.50.....144.48
2.52-2.60.....204.56
2.62-2.70.....120.96
2.72-2.80.....56.34
2.82-2.90.....76.75
2.92-3.00.....-56.59

I've now changed the last increment up to just 2.92 (back fitting or what) giving me.....46.86 (instead of -56.59).

That's +988 for laying with $30 liability (no commission deducted though).

It is only 134 bets though however so it's probably running really hot (or cold as it's laying) right now.

There have been 34 losing lay bets out of those 134 races to date (75% SR).

Do the above figures give anyone any idea if level stakes or liability would be better?

__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale