14th December 2005, 07:18 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Winston_Smith
i could have launched into statement calling farcical your reference as "surprisingly high". justified in light of $557 pool size for race 1 at caloundra that day. but i did not.
in fact your post actually ask why others not use Austote. (again, click above link to read actual post). my post is direct response to mr chrome prince question and your question. it explain clearly why i not use austote for serious bet.
Thank you. Winston.
|
I'm surprised that no one has picked up on this farcical pool of $557.
Compare that with CALOUNDRA 1 (the equivalent race) last Sunday you'll find the pool was $18,499!
That $557 in November was clearly something abnormal, particularly when you note how later races that day picked up substantially.
Unless my mind is playing tricks on me, there was some sort of system problem early that day.
Clearly that $557 is an inappropriate instance on which to base an argument, but presumably taking the trouble to find meaningful data would have been too much of an imposition for my former correspondent.
|