Quote:
Wasn't thinking of backing them. I was simply asking if that was the circumstances that you measured in your test. |
A thousand pardons Sportz I read your post too quickly and misunderstood the gist of your question. Yes, that's exactly what I would do in the context of the test.
|
As regards track differences - I've run the figures on NSW races using the SP to find the favorite or longest priced horse and the returns based on the NSW TAB payout.
Longest priced horses return.
KV |
Yeah, that was pretty much what I thought.
|
Longshots seldom come alone
Hi KV!
Flemingtom today! Two over tens, and kabooom, a $68 longshot. That will do me. Although, why Roman Arch was at those odds beats me? I had it as a third selection, but that's beside the point!!! Cheers |
Good on ya Marcus. I mean to test this multiple longshot thing when I get time. Can't say I agreed on Roman Arch, I had him gasping for breath 6 and a half lengths behind the winner so I certainly wouldn't have picked him on ratings alone. But still, I didn't lose any quinellas at Flemington because I never got a first one to come up - didn't even come close, which might explain my failure on RA.
KV |
[QUOTE= I mean to test this multiple longshot thing when I get time.[/QUOTE]
Hi KV! Know what you mean! I will do it myself soon, lucky I only bet on a limited number of meetings, I don't think it would work, betting on every meeting, every race. Not having done the research I just don't know. As to Roman Arch, we all have a different approach to rating. Sometimes I am right, other times you are. Wish we all would be right a bit more often though?? Cheers |
All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:11 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.